Online Response Form


List of answers to the specified question
Mr Groombridge Parcel 14 (Knowle Hill Park and next to Blundel Lane, Stoke d’Abernon):
• With regard to Parcel 14 – the semi - rural nature, the topography of the land and the existing housing in the surrounding area
• Economics of building social/affordable housing in an area that is one of the most expensive in Elmbridge is unrealistic
• Infrastructure totally insufficient
• Moving from the current 8 hpd to the proposed 40 or 60 is quite totally out of keeping with the current environment
Parcel 20 (next to Portsmouth Road, Cobham):
• Infrastructure totally insufficient
• Will adversely affect air quality in a heavily polluted area
16 Feb 2017 12:27
Mr Groombridge No 16 Feb 2017 12:27
Peter Tottle No 28 Feb 2017 11:42
Richard Carr I think that the building density at any level on green belt land will irreparably alter the local character of the area. Re-labeling the land is merely a trick to reduce our protected green spaces. 19 Feb 2017 22:26
Richard Carr No 19 Feb 2017 22:26
Richard Welch High densities in these sites, without good infrastructure, is not in keeping with the semi-rural nature of the area and the existing housing stock, which has been created over time in keeping with the area and planning permissions. 06 Feb 2017 12:51
Richard Welch No 06 Feb 2017 12:51
Weybridge Society (Raymond Spary) If the question is development in the Green Belt the answer is no. If the question is to do with affordable housing then:-
We are not convinced that affordable housing can be achieved and maintained in the Elmbridge area without exceptional financial arrangements. With good design maybe 50 dwellings per. hectare may be reasonable in some areas.
21 Feb 2017 00:01
Weybridge Society (Raymond Spary) No 21 Feb 2017 00:01
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) a. There should be no more high density building in the area of Parcel 14. It is already overstretched, and it would be completely out of keeping with the current environment.
This area is one of the most expensive in Elmbridge, and it would be a mistake to try and build social housing here. The people who need to be helped with social housing could not afford Elmbridge prices nor would they be supported with jobs or services in this area. The economics of building this type of housing here is unrealistic.

Parcel 20. The infrastructure here is totally insufficient and the Portsmouth Road is already heavily polluted. The open land alongside it helps to counteract this.
11 Feb 2017 16:28
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page