View Response

Response Details

Response Details
From William Banks
Date Started: 20 Jan 2017 17:19. Last modified: 20 Jan 2017 17:19
Status Complete
Response ID #517395

1

Agree that the challenges set out in section 2 of the consultation document are the key challenges facing Elmbridge?

 

  • Yes, I agree
  • No, I disagree
  • I don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

2

Do you consider there are other challenges that we should be addressing?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

3

Do you consider any particular challenge or challenges that are more important than the others?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

4

Agree that Option 2 is the most appropriate option?

  • Yes, I agree
  • No, I disagree
  • I don’t know

If you disagree, please explain why and what other option would you support and why?
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

5

Do you consider the suggested exceptional circumstances are sufficient to support the amendment of the Green Belt boundary?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

6

Agree that, given the appropriate exceptional circumstances, these three key strategic areas are appropriate for removal from the Green Belt?

 

  • Yes, I agree
  • No, I disagree
  • I don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

7

Do you know of any sites within any of the three key strategic areas that could be considered for future development?

 

  • Yes
  • No

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

8

Do you consider that other areas of land should be removed from the Green Belt including those that are moderately or strongly performing?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

9

Do you agree that we should seek to provide more of a balance in terms of the size of new homes being built?  

 

  • Yes, I agree
  • No, I disagree
  • Don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

10

Given the over delivery of homes with 4 or more bedrooms should we try to limit their delivery in future?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

11

Should we seek to increase minimum densities at sustainable locations in the urban areas, such as in town centres and at train stations, above 40 dwellings per hectare, where this would not impact on local character?

  • Yes (If yes, what density do you think would be appropriate?)
  • No
  • Don’t know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

12a

Within the three key strategic areas we will be exploring opportunities for accommodating our development needs taking into account site constraints, land ownership, compliance with other planning policies and the need to support sustainable development.  If potential housing sites are identified within these areas, do you consider it appropriate to

a. deliver at higher densities i.e. above 40 dwellings per hectare, in order to maximise delivery?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

12b

Within the three key strategic areas we will be exploring opportunities for accommodating our development needs taking into account site constraints, land ownership, compliance with other planning policies and the need to support sustainable development.  If potential housing sites are identified within these areas, do you consider it appropriate to:

b. Support lower density developments that maintain the open character of an area and reflects the surrounding character

 

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

13

Agree with our approach to continue to apply Policy CS21 of the Core Strategy e.g. consider on a case by case basis whether local circumstances are sufficient to warrant the requirement of affordable housing contributions on all sites where there is a net increase in housing and where it is viable?

 

  • Yes, I agree
  • No, I disagree
  • I don't know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

14

Are there any other aspects of Government policy which you think we should consider with regard to meeting the accommodation needs of non-travelling Travellers?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

15

Do you consider there to be any other specific housing needs that are an issue within Elmbridge and that we should seek to address as part of the new Local Plan?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

16

Do you agree that the Council should seek to protect our most important and strategic employment areas from redevelopment to uses other than offices, warehousing and factories?

 

  • Yes, I agree
  • No, I disagree
  • I don't know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

17

If not, what degree of flexibility do you consider would be appropriate with regard to alternative uses in such areas?

I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

18

Do you think that there are any exceptional circumstances that would support the amendment of the Green Belt boundary at Brooklands to support the further development of employment uses at this site?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

19

Other than Green Belt what other barriers do you consider could prevent further development at Brooklands?

I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

20

We will seek to maintain our broad support for tourism related development as set out in the Core Strategy. However, to recognise the importance of Sandown Park Racecourse as both a sporting and exhibition venue should we:

Encourage the redevelopment of Sandown Racecourse to provide improved and extended conference and hotel facilities?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

21a

Maintain our policy of focussing new retail development to town and village centres?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

21b

Continue to protect primary shopping areas from other uses as set out in the current Core Strategy?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

21c

Consider allowing other important uses in primary high street shopping frontages such as doctor’s surgeries, dentists and libraries?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

22

Should the Council continue to give a high level of protection to all open spaces and designate those spaces that meet the criteria for Local Green Spaces?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

23

Do you agree with our approach to biodiversity and mitigating the impact of new development on the Thames Basin Heaths habitat?

 

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

24

Do you agree that our strategic and pro-active approach to supporting our heritage assets is appropriate?

  • Yes, I agree
  • No, I disagree
  • I don't know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

25

If not, what approach do you think we should take?

I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

26

Do you agree that the Council’s current approach to considering design and character is appropriate?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

27

If not what approach do you think we should take?

I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

28

Should we look at including a policy providing more detailed advice on what is required to limit the cumulative impact of small scale development on flood risk?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

29

Do you consider the existing policies seeking to reduce the impacts of new development with regard to delivering more sustainable travel patterns outlined above are still appropriate?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

30

Are there other approaches we should consider?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't Know

Please explain your answer
I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

31

What do you consider to be the essential infrastructure items required to support new communities e.g. the potential development of the 3 key strategic areas?

I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

32

What smaller infrastructure improvements do you think could be made within your local area to address some of the negative impacts arising from new development?

I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

33

We recognise that there may be other issues or options we have not considered that you would like to raise. If there are we would like to hear these and consider them as part for this consultation. Please use this space to write anything else you would like us to consider.

 

I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.

34. Files

«No files»