Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
1981 (Oliver Bath) Current infrastructure - schools, doctors rooms, shops etc. Consider roads, rail roads, parking. Providing infrastructure for the 3 identified sites is considerably harder than linking one larger site in a logistically better positioned area. 22 Feb 2017 10:25
A Flack Parking seems a low priority when any new development is being built 03 Feb 2017 14:15
A Littler Good direct cycling and walking routes, so that cycling/walking can be as easy or easier and more pleasant than driving for journeys of under 3 miles. Milton Keynes is a good example of popular cycle routes because they are very useable.

Pleasant and safe cycle routes from new developments to the station, shops, schools, medical facilities, library etc etc. For them to be useable, they should be considered right from the start of planning any new development, not tacked on cheaply at the end.
18 Feb 2017 10:12
A S Cooper There is no such thing as sensitive, sustainable or supported building or development on green belt land. Green belt means no building or development and this would include the building of any infrastructure required to support the existing local population. Local government cannot build to capacity on brownfield sites and then make a case for taking green belt to provide the hospitals, doctors, water plant, roads and businesses to support what has been built. Development in existing brownfiled sites should be properly planned to accommodate supporting services without recourse to taking protected green belt land. If that has not been done then poor council planning cannot be made to justify it. 08 Feb 2017 11:15
A. Fletcher • Opportunities should be explored near to established fast transport links with easy transport access. An example would be the fast Woking/Walton/Esher line
• Providing infrastructure for the three identified sites is considerably more complex and expensive than linking one larger site in a logistically better positioned area
• Current infrastructure and services are already not fit for purpose.
• Essential infrastructure developments that must be considered before development of the proposed areas include:
o Alternative road patterns be developed to ease existing and future traffic congestion, including improvement of rail road bridges, roundabouts and traffic lights.
o Adequate number of schools, surgeries and green areas to ensure quality of life for residents.
o Parking at or near transportation links, including Stoke d’Abernon and Cobham Stations.
o Improvements of bus services in area offering alternative to travel by car.
24 Feb 2017 09:51
ACS International Schools (Ms… Traffic flow improvement and road safety/crossings 21 Feb 2017 14:55
Adam Bowie • Opportunities should be explored near to established fast transport links with easy transport access. An example would be the fast Woking/Walton/Esher line
• Providing infrastructure for the three identified sites is considerably more complex and expensive than linking one larger site in a logistically better positioned area
• Current infrastructure and services are already not fit for purpose.
• Essential infrastructure developments that must be considered before development of the proposed areas include:
o Alternative road patterns be developed to ease existing and future traffic congestion, including improvement of rail road bridges, roundabouts and traffic lights.
o Adequate number of schools, surgeries and green areas to ensure quality of life for residents.
o Parking at or near transportation links, including Stoke d’Abernon and Cobham Stations.
o Improvements of bus services in area offering alternative to travel by car.
08 Mar 2017 10:11
Adam Woodhouse Opportunities should be explored near to established fast transport links with easy transport access, an example would be the fast Woking/Walton/Esher line.
Providing infrastructure for the three identified sites is considerably more complex and expensive than linking one larger site in a logistically better positioned area which should be prioritised over the areas identified in this consultation where current infrastructure and services are already not fit for purpose.
Essential infrastructure developments that must be considered before development of the proposed areas include:
• Alternative road patterns be developed to ease existing and future traffic congestion, including improvement of rail road bridges, roundabouts and traffic lights.
• Adequate number of schools, surgeries, parks and green areas to ensure quality of life for residents.
• Parking at or near transportation links, including Stoke d’Abernon and Cobham Stations.
• Improvements of bus services in area offering alternative to travel by car.
22 Feb 2017 10:50
Adrian Hornzee New communities require sufficient access to: healthcare, schools, employment opportunities, rail, road, parking, sporting and leisure facilities, retail facilities. All of these are already stretched to the maximum in Oxshott and the surrounding area.

Surely it is far more economical and less damaging to the environment to extend the infrastructure we already have in urban centres – than to build it almost from scratch in small town/village settings or on green belt.

• Opportunities should be explored near to established fast transport links with easy transport access. An example would be the fast Woking/Walton/Esher line
• Providing infrastructure for the three identified sites is considerably more complex and expensive than linking one larger site in a logistically better positioned area in an existing urban centre
• Current infrastructure and services are already not fit for purpose.
• I completely disagree with the premise that the proposed areas should be developed. There is not clear and compelling evidence of the need and there are no Exceptional Circumstances to justify development of green belt land. Even if there were such exceptional circumstances, the following essential infrastructure would need to be in place before any development could even be considered feasible or sustainable:
o Alternative road patterns be developed to ease existing and future traffic congestion, including improvement of rail road bridges, roundabouts and traffic lights.
o Adequate number of schools, surgeries and green areas to ensure quality of life for residents.
o Parking at or near transportation links, including Stoke d’Abernon and Cobham Stations.
o Improvements of bus services in area offering alternative to travel by car.
14 Mar 2017 10:41
Adrian Whyte Opportunities should be explored near to established fast transport links with easy transport access. An example would be the fast Woking/Walton/Esher line
Providing infrastructure for the three identified sites is considerably more complex and expensive than linking one larger site in a logistically better positioned area
• Current infrastructure and services are already not fit for purpose.
• Essential infrastructure developments that must be considered before development of the proposed areas include:

o Alternative road patterns be developed to ease existing and future traffic congestion, including improvement of rail road bridges, roundabouts and traffic lights.
o Adequate number of schools, surgeries and green areas to ensure quality of life for residents.
o Parking at or near transportation links, including Stoke d’Abernon and Cobham Stations.
o Improvements of bus services in area offering alternative to travel by car.
06 Feb 2017 09:58
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page