Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Yoko Crow Yes 24 Feb 2017 09:46
Xerxes Pochkhanavala Yes 22 Feb 2017 10:08
Wrens Hill Residents Associati… And larger scale developments 23 Jan 2017 15:55
Wrens Hill Residents Associati… Yes 23 Jan 2017 15:55
William MacArthur Any plan of this complexity cannot be considered in isolation and hence we
fundamentally disagree with an approach that just singles out housing.
25 Jan 2017 16:05
William MacArthur Yes 25 Jan 2017 16:05
William Fellows Yes 12 Jan 2017 13:13
William Bradwell • Any plan of this complexity cannot be considered in isolation and hence we fundamentally disagree with an approach that just singles out housing. 20 Mar 2017 10:09
William Bradwell Yes 20 Mar 2017 10:09
William Banks I do not see the point of your lengthy response forms in terms of the way it has been set out and thus I am submitting the follow statement, which must be taken into account.

I don't agree with your findings or solution. The point of the green belt was to stop urban sprawl, one town collapsing into another. You have vast areas areas along the A3 that could be used, new villages could be set up.

You solution will merge Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon and thus Cobham, ruining the beautiful area. The villages will be no more.This is what took place in Chalfont St Giles, increasing the crime rate and bring people into the area whom did not fit. It is now unsafe for people to live their lives they way they once did there and the area has been ruined.

The doctors will not be able to cope, already overwhelmed, the schools are also ready over subscribed and 9,500 homes will bring 20,000 additional cars to roads that are already over congested.

This is thus a terrible idea of which the locals DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR WANT. REJECT IT.
20 Jan 2017 17:19
Next pageLast page