Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Mick Flannigan I have seen too many planning permissions granted where scale and character of the proposed building has been ugly, insensitive, etc. 19 Dec 2016 13:56
S McCarthy more needs to be done though
however must allow innovative new design for new developments to carry on the tradition from the 1960s such as Templemere in Oatlands
08 Jan 2017 14:59
Jamie Mainwaring It must always be a reflection of what is currently in the community. 09 Jan 2017 12:00
Deleted User So long as it includes maintaining character of areas by not building new housing such as that proposed 09 Jan 2017 21:26
John Girdley Far too many housing developments have been allowed which use block and render with slate roofs rather than the brick and clay tile that was once a feature of Surrey properties. 10 Jan 2017 10:46
Deleted User It is vital to retain the character of the different towns and villages 10 Jan 2017 17:22
Michael Gadbury The new development in Cobham High Street is out of character with other buildings and is an example of where its approach is wrong! 11 Jan 2017 16:36
John Millward However, the devil is in the detail and varies from location to location. 12 Jan 2017 16:01
Raymond Coe I suggest that there should be more emphasis on design which actually improves or enhances an area and not just design that maintains current character. 12 Jan 2017 17:44
Paul Rosewarn it is important to maintain the character of villages and towns. Certainly not joining them in to one amorphous area, which may happen when removing areas of greenbelt. 14 Jan 2017 09:54
Next pageLast page