Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Burwin Investments (Mark Wingfield) Elmbridge needs to protect these area of employment. there needs to be a balance between housing and employment land. 17 Dec 2016 11:28
Holton Homes (Clive Wingfield) loss of employment will cause income problems 02 Jan 2017 07:19
FEDORA (David Cooke) We need jobs other than those in London 06 Jan 2017 13:27
V Braun Providing local employment opportunities should reduce the pressure on our roads and railways; business taxes will benefit the wider community. 08 Jan 2017 19:36
James Chowne Offices, warehouses and factories are already urban areas and should be turned into housing before developing Green Belt land. In particular, unused business sites should be targeted for residential dwellings. 08 Jan 2017 20:09
Deleted User • Mixed residential/retail/small business developments are very viable and effective
• Mixed residential/retail/small business developments are the norm in many other countries in Europe and have proven successful.
• Mixed residential/retail/small business developments are likely to draw the required talent/labour resources to the strategic employment areas in the Borough and do so in a more affordable manner
09 Jan 2017 08:55
John Girdley All plans have to be financed and finance is best derived from employment. 10 Jan 2017 10:46
Deleted User Yes I agree that areas of employment are very important and shouldn't be developed on. 10 Jan 2017 13:08
Deleted User I don't believe that local shops should be turned into houses. 10 Jan 2017 17:22
William Fellows I think certain strategic employment areas may very well be capable of being redesignated so as to provide affordable housing. 12 Jan 2017 13:13
Next pageLast page