Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Burwin Investments (Mark Wingfield) affordable housing. 17 Dec 2016 11:28
Mick Flannigan Nowhere near enough provision for the elderly. 19 Dec 2016 13:56
Holton Homes (Clive Wingfield) starter homes and 3 and 4 bedroomed family homes 02 Jan 2017 07:19
FEDORA (David Cooke) The houses available are the houses available. Elmbridge does not have a duty to house everyone who might wish to live in the borough. 06 Jan 2017 13:27
Rachel Warren Key worker housing especially to attract teachers and social workers to live and work in Elmbridge 08 Jan 2017 16:28
James Chowne To concentrate on providing family homes with large outdoor space and maintenance of green, open spaces for the enjoyment of future generations and to encourage healthy, active lifestyles by protecting playing fields and school grounds. 08 Jan 2017 20:09
Deleted User The need to preserve existing character of the area and protect against new developments such as that proposed in the 3 proposals 09 Jan 2017 21:26
Deleted User I'm not aware of any. 10 Jan 2017 13:08
Deleted User But a reasonable approach is needed 11 Jan 2017 11:10
Michael Gadbury You should carry out better research on the current issues with the existing houses and building policies. Too many developments and poor developments are being allowed. Take a look at Blundel Lane for example, It is a narrow road built many years ago when traffic was minimal. It sits between Danes Hill and Parkside schools, often has horses using it, has a narrow dangerous bridge and the Junction with Stoke Road is extremely dangerous, particularly during peak periods.
To consider building on the Green Belt land alongside there is just pure madness and is obviously suggested by people who have no idea of the current issues. Similarly, try getting through Cobham at rush hour times! The road infrastructure is nowhere near good enough to take any more traffic.
11 Jan 2017 16:36
Next pageLast page