Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Mick Flannigan The difficulty is, defining "affordable". In Walton, hardly anywhere is truly affordable by those most in need of housing. 19 Dec 2016 13:56
FEDORA (David Cooke) T.his seems sensible 06 Jan 2017 13:27
Rachel Warren There is a massive imbalance across Elmbridge with affordable housing concentrated in particular areas. This can have a knock-on effect on other services particularly schools. It is essential that any housing strategy places a strong emphasis on distributing affordable housing throughout the borough 08 Jan 2017 16:28
Deleted User • A blanket approach to the challenge around development of affordable housing regardless of the quality of life and/or environmental impact is not the right way to go. Each area is different and there needs to be some accurate science behind the proposed development of each site in the Borough 09 Jan 2017 08:55
Jamie Mainwaring Affordable housing for police officers, nurses, fireman is a good thing. 09 Jan 2017 12:00
Deleted User It places an inequitable burden on small developers, whereas the big companies including supermarkets (who also have alternative income streams) can easily absorb the costs. 09 Jan 2017 12:36
Deleted User Please don't introduce any affordable housing. 09 Jan 2017 18:59
John Girdley Affordable housing is needed to support local services, but allocation must be given on a case by case basis. Affordable housing is not a Right! 10 Jan 2017 10:46
Deleted User All residents should be able to find somewhere to live that they can afford, but I don't know how this is decided so I can't say if I agree or not. 10 Jan 2017 13:08
Michael Gadbury Not on amy Green Belt Land for the reasons stated earlier. 11 Jan 2017 16:36
Next pageLast page