Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Yoko Crow Do not believe Parcels14 or 20 should be developed. The analysisis subjective and flawed 24 Feb 2017 09:46
Yoko Crow No 24 Feb 2017 09:46
Yaneth Pringle Don't Know 22 Feb 2017 22:15
Xerxes Pochkhanavala Yes 22 Feb 2017 10:08
Wrens Hill Residents Associati… The identification of these areas is totally illogical and not based on any sound reason 23 Jan 2017 15:55
Wrens Hill Residents Associati… No 23 Jan 2017 15:55
Woolf Bond Planning (strvwn Brown) See covering letter.

The key feature of the urban area in Elmbridge is the relatively low-density character within many of its settlements according to the paragraph 2.2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan: Strategic Options
Consultation (Reg 18) from December 2016.

At the same time the Land Availability Assessment form September 2016 identifies that due to the Borough's location within the Green Belt the amount of land available for development is constricted. Consequently, both of the documents highlight the high demand for property in the Borough and increasingly deepening affordability issues.

While we fully support increasing of density in urban areas, there remains an opportunity to allocate suitable and sustainable sites, such as Claygate House and its land to the rear (east), for housing development. This will help to deliver a broad mix of housing to complement higher density flatted schemes elsewhere in the Borough.
21 Mar 2017 15:42
Woolf Bond Planning (strvwn Brown) Yes 21 Mar 2017 15:42
William Reed See previous comment. 21 Feb 2017 10:35
William Reed No 21 Feb 2017 10:35
Next pageLast page