Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Deleted User Yes 21 Mar 2017 14:10
Deleted User See answers above 21 Mar 2017 13:38
Deleted User Yes 21 Mar 2017 13:38
Deleted User • No other land should be removed from the Green Belt.
• I must strongly object and put on the record that the nature of the questions in this document is manipulative and self-serving seeking to justify the Council’s views, and is thus not consultative but merely ticking boxes.
• It is worth reiterating that housing is not an exceptional circumstance to remove Green Belt land and is strongly opposed by the majority of residents.
• I believe that urban regeneration is the way forward and that more joined up thinking across Council boundaries is required to find an optimum solution.
21 Mar 2017 13:15
Deleted User No 21 Mar 2017 13:15
Anthony Williamson Don’t know 21 Mar 2017 12:55
Deleted User  We believe that urban regeneration is the way forward and that more joined up thinking and cooperation across boundaries is required in order to find an optimum solution
 The Council has admitted it has not assessed the viability or contribution of the moderately performing sites and this seems an oversight that must be urgently corrected
 Providing infrastructure for the three identified sites is considerably more complex and expensive than linking one larger site in a logistically better positioned area
 Any plan of this complexity cannot be considered in isolation and hence we fundamentally disagree with an approach that just singles out housing
 It is worth reiterating that housing is NOT an exceptional circumstance to remove Green Belt and does not meet with the majority support of the residents
 We must also strongly object and put on the record that the nature of the questions is in our opinion manipulative and self-serving seeking to justify the Council’s recommendations and is thus not consultative but merely ticking boxes
21 Mar 2017 12:22
Deleted User No 21 Mar 2017 12:22
Duncan Crane Yes and No was ticked.
This may be a possibility but only if it meets the conditions set out in my response to 1, 4 and 5 above. In my opinion the only likely areas to be able to support successful and sustainable new or extended communities within the borough are in the corridor between Surbiton in the East, Hampton in the North and Woking in the West as this is the only area capable of providing the necessary mix of appropriate services.

Using different criteria whilst still within the definition provided by Government, some green belt land in this area might be considered appropriate for re-designation. For example some of the many sport facilities which are duplicative, reserved for exclusive clubs or used infrequently cover significant areas of land in highly suitable locations. However any such re-designation would have to depend on specific and more detailed assessment as suggest in my responses to 1, 4 and 5 above.
21 Mar 2017 12:00
Duncan Crane Don’t know 21 Mar 2017 12:00
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page