Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Deleted User  We believe that this is the responsibility of the Council and would request that details of further options be provided. If the Council has not fully evaluated all the other options in these three areas it clearly must do so.
 We believe that the Council’s approach to only detail the largest three land masses is simplistic and erroneous. The actual amount of developable land is a more relevant and critical component.
Parcel 14 (Knowle Hill Park and north of Blundel Lane, Stoke d’Abernon):
 Parcel 14 topography next to Blundel Lane is steep, flood risk and was also a landfill site – so unsuitable for development
 Parcel 14 also has a Scout Camp which is widely used not just by Elmbridge but also by neighbouring boroughs including Kingston. Historic memorial present
 Parcel 14 also has a number of Ancient Woodlands
 Parcel 14 is covered with protected animal species
 Parcel 14 has a lake at the top of it and springs around the lower levels and floods
 Parcel 14 has clay work mine shafts and underground bunkers used during the Second World War
Parcel 20 (next to Portsmouth Road, Cobham):
 No part of Parcel 20 is suitable for development
 There are allotments on Parcel 20 which constrain development
 The Rugby Club has a very long lease on part of the land
21 Mar 2017 12:22
Deleted User No 21 Mar 2017 12:22
Duncan Crane The reasons for this are explained already in my answers to 1, 4 and 5 above 21 Mar 2017 12:00
Duncan Crane No 21 Mar 2017 12:00
Deleted User • No. I believe that this is the responsibility for the council and would request that details of further options be provided. If the council has not fully evaluated all the other options in these three areas it clearly must do so.
• I believe that the council’s approach to only detail the largest three land masses is simplistic and erroneous. The actual amount of developable land is a more relevant and critical component.

Parcel 14 (Knowle Hill Park and north of Blundel Lane, Stoke D’Abernon):

• Parcel 14 topography next to Blundel Lane is steep, flood risk and was also a landfill site – so unsuitable for development.
• Parcel 14 also has a ScoutCamp which is widely used not just by Elmbridge but also by neighbouring boroughs including Kingston. Historic memorial present.
• Parcel 14 also has a number of Ancient Woodlands.
• Parcel 14 is covered with protected animal species.
• Parcel 14 has a lake at the top of it and springs around the lower levels and floods.
• Parcel 14 has clay work mine shafts and underground bunkers used during the second world war
Parcel 20 (next to Portsmouth Road, Cobham):
• No part of Parcel 20 is suitable for development.
• There are allotments on Parcel 20 which constrain development.
• The Rugby Club has a very long lease on part of the land.
21 Mar 2017 11:46
Deleted User No 21 Mar 2017 11:46
Save Cobham Green Belt (Keith… • No. As we said above most of Parcel 14 is not for sale or developable due to the above constraints
• We believe that the Council’s approach to only detail the largest three land masses is simplistic and erroneous. The actual amount of developable land is a more relevant and critical component.
• This should have been done across numerous parcels after a full investigation of Urban and Brownfield opportunities

Parcel 14 (Knowle Hill Park and north of Blundel Lane, Stoke d’Abernon):

• Parcel 14 topography next to Blundel Lane is steep, flood risk and was also a landfill site – so unsuitable for development
• Parcel 14 also has a Scout Camp which is widely used not just by Elmbridge but also by neighbouring boroughs including Kingston. Historic memorial present. Trustees stated it is not up for any Development
• Parcel 14 also has a number of extensive Ancient Woodlands
• Parcel 14 has extensive Common Land
• Parcel 14 is covered with protected animal species
• Parcel 14 has a lake at the top of it and springs around the lower levels and floods
• Parcel 14 has clay work mine shafts and underground bunkers used during the Second World War
• Millgate have put the vast majority of developable land out of reach of any future development
• Clearly this Parcel is totally unsuitable for any of the Council’s proposals


Parcel 20 (next to Portsmouth Road, Cobham):
• No part of Parcel 20 is suitable for development
• There are allotments on Parcel 20 which constrain development
• The Rugby Club has a very long lease on part of the land
• Protected species
• Common land, gas mains, agricultural status, mineral area, conservation area
21 Mar 2017 11:14
Save Cobham Green Belt (Keith… No 21 Mar 2017 11:14
Birds Hill Oxshott Estate Co.… 1) Land north of Blundel Lane, Cobham
We do not consider that any parts of this key strategic area are suitable for development.
2) Land south of the A3 including Chippings Farm and The Fairmile, Cobham The central portion of the site around Chippings Farm and The Fairmile public house and Premier Inn is the only part of this key strategic area that could be considered for development.
3) Land north of the A309 and east and west of Woodstock Lane North, Long Ditton
The narrow strip of land east of Woodstock Lane between Long Ditton and the A3 is the only part of this area where it could be considered that the open setting of the Green Belt is not compromised by the surrounding existing development.
21 Mar 2017 11:06
Birds Hill Oxshott Estate Co.… Yes 21 Mar 2017 11:06
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page