Online Response Form


List of answers to the specified question
Peter Tottle Water works 28 Feb 2017 11:42
Peter Tottle Yes 28 Feb 2017 11:42
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) They all have their part to play in the balance of the urban areas around them. They are part of the important and supportive ecological and wildlife corridors linking these urban areas.
In my view, Parcel 14 is too valuable an amenity to even think of destroying!
Polyapes, with its memorial, is a very valued community area, giving Scouts and young people fun and life experience in the open air. It is shared with neighbouring boroughs, including Kingston-Upon-Thames, and commemorative Remembrance Days for people who fought and gave their lives for this country.
It is a historic treasure with its mineshafts and underground bunkers used during the Second World War.
These areas are made up of Ancient Woodlands, flood plain, lake and ponds formed from natural springs.
Parcel 20. This, too, forms part of the green, wildlife corridors together with its ecologically friendly allotments.
It is the responsibility of the Council to consider and give details of other options.
11 Feb 2017 16:28
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) No 11 Feb 2017 16:28
1963 (Will Durston) EBC needs to consider more than just the three largest land masses outlined in the proposal. This crude approach is over-simplistic. 21 Feb 2017 19:45
1963 (Will Durston) No 21 Feb 2017 19:45
1981 (Oliver Bath) I believe that the Council’s approach to only detail the largest three land masses is simplistic and erroneous. The actual amount of developable land is a more relevant and critical component. 22 Feb 2017 10:25
1981 (Oliver Bath) No 22 Feb 2017 10:25
A Emery No 21 Feb 2017 12:16
A Emery The area incorporating Parcel 58, which is set upon a hill, is prone to flooding. The land around the Church and the Cricket Club flood regularly and building on this area is likely to exacerbate the issue. Stokes Field Nature Reserve has a variety of habitats including woodland, grassland and scrub. It also has a pond. This cannot be destroyed. It must be protected. * NO part of Area 58 is suitable for ANY development because: Local infrastructure would not cope (schools, roads, hospitals, public transport etc) * Pollution levels are already high due to the A3 * Other local building projects are under way in neighbouring boroughs that will already put a strain on local infrastructure in that area and add to pollution 21 Feb 2017 12:16
Next pageLast page