Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Holton Homes (Clive Wingfield) Yes, I agree 02 Jan 2017 07:19
Holton Homes (Clive Wingfield) the Blundel Lane site if in used land serving no purpose and would be ideal for this purpose 02 Jan 2017 07:19
Daniel Cullen No, I disagree 05 Jan 2017 13:30
Daniel Cullen Redevelopment of Green Belt land in Local Area 14 (North of Blundel Lane) and the implementation of housing would greatly effect traffic on roads already used heavily as a link between Oxshott, Stoke D'Abernon and Cobham. Additionally the increased population of the area would put greater stress on health services in the area as well as schooling provision. State primary schools in Cobham and Oxshott are already oversubscribed and due to the proposed housing being affordable it can be assumed that new housing would results in more applications to these state schools. It is unlikely that any development of infrastructure would be able to reduce the effect of over 400 new homes being built. Furthermore the increased risk of flooding in areas near to Local Area 14 (especially housing on Blundel Lane) should be cause for concern, as should the effect on the appeal and value of houses in the area.

I am unable to confidently address the remaining two key areas due to a lack of familiarity with them.
05 Jan 2017 13:30
Deleted User No, I disagree 05 Jan 2017 19:32
Deleted User Yes, I agree 06 Jan 2017 08:32
FEDORA (David Cooke) We need to maintain green areas amongst our communities. 06 Jan 2017 13:27
FEDORA (David Cooke) No, I disagree 06 Jan 2017 13:27
Deleted User I think you should consider a better spread of the housing location. The plan does not consider how densely populated the Kingston borough is, and therefore offers a biased view of green belt 08 Jan 2017 09:54
Deleted User No, I disagree 08 Jan 2017 09:54
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page