Online Response Form


List of answers to the specified question
Zdenek Cerny Yes 20 Feb 2017 17:11
Zdenek Cerny As mentioned in my answer to Question 1, prevention of urban sprawl by retaining the Green Belt Area 58 is a key concern.
Maintaining the quality of life for local residents by keeping access to open spaces is equally important.
The potential for increasing the risk of local flooding by expanding the built up area over the existing open land needs to be also seriously addressed.
20 Feb 2017 17:11
Yomi Akin Yes 20 Feb 2017 21:00
Yomi Akin There are many examples of how the need for housing has been met without resorting to butchering the very last bit of greenery of importance in this particular area, There is already a considerable about of traffic and attendant polluting effects of vehicles as a result of the A3. To exacerbate that and at the same time implement schemes that will negate natural elements like trees and greenery which offer some respite and biologically filter the effects of such pollution is beyond intelligent comprehension. And when i say many examples, you only have to look at countries like Holland and the Scandinavian countries to see how they cleverly meet their own housing challenges without ripping the very fabric of suburban living. 20 Feb 2017 21:00
Yoko Crow To retain the quality of life for existing residents in Elmbridge. 24 Feb 2017 09:46
Yoko Crow Yes 24 Feb 2017 09:46
Yaneth Pringle Yes 22 Feb 2017 22:15
Yaneth Pringle More secondary schools 22 Feb 2017 22:15
Xerxes Pochkhanavala Improve the roads and work on getting more local transport for the working community getting into London. 22 Feb 2017 10:08
Xerxes Pochkhanavala Yes 22 Feb 2017 10:08
Next pageLast page