A New Local Plan: The Options Consultation

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
BGL Group (Michael Fletcher) Its been well considered over a very long period of time. Further delay and cost should not be allowed. Councillors should support planning officer recommendations. 19 Aug 2019 09:34
Mrs Verrill I wholeheartedly object to using green belt land. It was designated for a reason and should be protected against urban sprawl. Your building will irreversibly ruin those areas forever. 19 Aug 2019 11:00
Lesley Sullivan N/a 19 Aug 2019 11:18
Esher CAAC (Michael Phillips) It is good to have the opportunity to put forward views and help plan for sustainable prosperity 19 Aug 2019 12:06
Geoffrey Bills As above.I feel that the whole plan should be subject to judicial review or at least just thrown back at the government.In clearly being a GLA driven 'stitch up' in which cross borough boundary 'cooperation' has been deliberately corrupted into a deliberate attempt to circumvent Green Belt policy regarding stopping further expansion of London.In addition to illegally putting a non London Borough under GLA development policy.Elmbridge clearly being a quasi wannabee London borough in that regard in enthusiastically cooperating with it to the detriment of areas like Claygate. 19 Aug 2019 12:20
Mick Flannigan There is no option to chose "none of the above". The housing needs target is excessive and needs to be challenged. 19 Aug 2019 12:24
V Bevan I know Elmbridge is between a rock and a hard place on this. Please, please protect as far as possible our lovely neighbourhood and do not sell out to greedy developers in order to hastily erect as many houses as possible to meet Government stringencies. 19 Aug 2019 12:51
Cheryl Seward I have opted for Option 2 as the least "worst" option as it stands. However I feel that the council should be joining forces with other local authorities to challenge the excessive housing targets set by the government. The target set of 9,345 homes over the next 15 years is alarming and Elmbridge is always expected to take more than its fair share of the new housing quota. 19 Aug 2019 13:01
Friends of Hurst Park (Jill Sa… I do think every effort must be made to protect ALL undeveloped land in regards to climate change. We know the importance of vegetation and soft landscaping. Development must be focused into already developed areas and on brownfield sites. 19 Aug 2019 14:20
Donald Shaw Yes you are trying to force a solution based on a limited range of options in relation to proposals which don`t appear thought out so as to avid increased urbanisation. 19 Aug 2019 14:30
Next pageLast page