A New Local Plan: The Options Consultation

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Andrew Soye I think the balance between existing developments and existing green spaces is about right. I don't believe in the other options. 19 Aug 2019 09:13
Andrew Soye Option 4 19 Aug 2019 09:13
BGL Group (Michael Fletcher) Greenbelt is great -BUT - it must serve a purpose for the community and be economically sustainable. For the community to benefit from the existence of greenbelt, and its owner sustain its management, current boundaries must change. 19 Aug 2019 09:34
BGL Group (Michael Fletcher) Option 2 19 Aug 2019 09:34
Adrian Biddle I am strongly opposed to green belt development, as the green belt is the reason why people choose to live here. Open spaces such as recreation areas and car parks in the urban area are also important to the community and should not be given over to development. Option 2 seems to reach the best balance, as it limits green belt development to three weakly performing areas whilst at the same time avoiding the conversion to housing of important urban spaces. I am strongly opposed to option 3 and option 5, as these would destroy the character of the area and put huge pressure on minor roads. 19 Aug 2019 10:17
Adrian Biddle Option 2 19 Aug 2019 10:17
William MacArthur Option 4 19 Aug 2019 10:53
Mrs Verrill Because by not using existing built up areas you encourage urban sprawl and ruin the character of ancient leafy villages 19 Aug 2019 11:00
Mrs Verrill Option 4 19 Aug 2019 11:00
Lee Gibbs The area's infrastructure already cannot realistically cope. High streets and roads such as Fairmile lane are so busy at peak times, 5 minute journeys can take 30-40 minutes. Trains are too infrequent for the number of commuters. Too few school and amenities. 19 Aug 2019 11:18
Next pageLast page