Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Peter Tottle Smaller flats is better. 28 Feb 2017 11:42
Peter Tottle No 28 Feb 2017 11:42
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) Parcels 14 and 20 should not be developed. In my view, the analysis of their performance is totally inaccurate. 11 Feb 2017 16:28
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) No 11 Feb 2017 16:28
1963 (Will Durston) I don't believe it is appropriate to develop Green Belt at all, so this question, which is about developing at a lower density level, is not appropriate / not relevant. The infrastructure is already insufficient to support local demand today. 21 Feb 2017 19:45
1963 (Will Durston) No 21 Feb 2017 19:45
1981 (Oliver Bath) I DO NOT believe Areas 58, 14 or 20 should be developed. The analysis is subjective and flawed. 22 Feb 2017 10:25
1981 (Oliver Bath) No 22 Feb 2017 10:25
A Emery Reasons stated above. Areas cannot sustain such development. 21 Feb 2017 12:16
A Emery No 21 Feb 2017 12:16
Next pageLast page