Online Response Form


List of answers to the specified question
Peter Tottle No 28 Feb 2017 11:42
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) a. There should be no more high density building in the area of Parcel 14. It is already overstretched, and it would be completely out of keeping with the current environment.
This area is one of the most expensive in Elmbridge, and it would be a mistake to try and build social housing here. The people who need to be helped with social housing could not afford Elmbridge prices nor would they be supported with jobs or services in this area. The economics of building this type of housing here is unrealistic.

Parcel 20. The infrastructure here is totally insufficient and the Portsmouth Road is already heavily polluted. The open land alongside it helps to counteract this.
11 Feb 2017 16:28
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) No 11 Feb 2017 16:28
1963 (Will Durston) No 21 Feb 2017 19:45
1963 (Will Durston) The current infrastructure in Long Ditton / Hinchley Wood (Area 58) is insufficient to support high density housing. The schools cannot cope with current numbers, yet alone further demand. Commuter volumes using Surbiton station have dramatically increased over the last 10-15 years and the rail network is unable to deal with peak demands during the morning and evening rush hours. 21 Feb 2017 19:45
1974 (Sefik Villasante) Don't Know 12 Feb 2017 18:05
1981 (Oliver Bath) In relation to area 58 - Again, infrastructure is insufficient. Council says it's committed to sustainable development. Will adversely affect our air quality. Why not build social housing closer to sources of employment?? 22 Feb 2017 10:25
1981 (Oliver Bath) No 22 Feb 2017 10:25
1st Cobham Scout Group (Patric… Parcel 14 (Knowle Hill Park and next to Blundel Lane, Stoke d'Abernon):
 With regard to Parcel 14 – the semi-rural nature, the topography of the land and the existing housing in the surrounding area
 Economics of building social/affordable housing in an area that is one of the most expensive in Elmbridge is unrealistic
 Infrastructure totally insufficient
 Moving from the current 8 hpd to the proposed 40 or 60 is quite totally out of keeping with the current environment

Parcel 20 (next to Portsmouth Road, Cobham):
 Infrastructure totally insufficient
 Will adversely affect air quality in a heavily polluted area
Will threaten amenities eg Cobham RFC
will create congestion on exit from Cobham to A3 at Pains Hill already bursting !!!!!
07 Feb 2017 22:12
1st Cobham Scout Group (Patric… No 07 Feb 2017 22:12
Next pageLast page