Online Response Form

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Peter Tottle We need smaller houses. 28 Feb 2017 11:42
Peter Tottle Yes, I agree 28 Feb 2017 11:42
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) Without doubt, more cheaper homes should be built for people who are less well-off, and who have lower incomes. These need to be built in appropriate areas where there are suitable jobs and a community structure to support them in the way of accessible train links, bus services etc.
The suitability of brownfield sites and their potential for being developed into attractive community areas should be thoroughly investigated.
There should be more cooperation and discussion across boundaries, in order to move forward for the sake of future generations who will have to live with the decisions being made at this time.
11 Feb 2017 16:28
1939 (Elizabeth Ann) Yes, I agree 11 Feb 2017 16:28
1981 (Oliver Bath) Yes, I agree 22 Feb 2017 10:25
A Flack Yes, I agree 03 Feb 2017 14:15
A Littler Yes, I agree 18 Feb 2017 10:12
A Littler Considerable parts of Elmbridge are moving away from pleasant mixed communities in which people feel ownership and want to engage with society, towards huge houses for single families, and gated developments. Strategic planning has a large part to play in improving the balance.
Urban renewal and regeneration continues to be of high priority and I believe the Council should be seeking to use brownfield sites. Increased density in such areas will allow for the provision of smaller, more affordable homes
18 Feb 2017 10:12
A S Cooper I refer to my previous answers on the need to build services to support any further development on brownfield sites and to continue to protect green belt land. 08 Feb 2017 11:15
A S Cooper No, I disagree 08 Feb 2017 11:15
Next pageLast page